It’s generally not a good idra to give others access to your home network

Why does Wireguard or any other VPN not work like Tailscale or Zerotier?

tailscale and zerotier are wireguard, but with a public server that helps with NAT. Syncthing uses a public server for that too.

wireguard was specifically made to be as simple and minimalistic as possible.

Why don’t torrent clients can’t work with IPv6 to seed more?

is there such a problem? honest question. But I think that might be a different issue

Why doesn’t Plex adopt a similar mechanic like Syncthing to expose the media over the Internet instead of being a prisoner of CGNAT?

maybe they just don’t see working on it profitable enough

openvpn and apache can be very time consuming to set up if you do it for the first time

at first I was thinking the subscription is for when you don’t host your own server but you use theirs. but it seems they limit client-side features even when you use your own server. that’s interesting

This is incorrect. If you properly test your code such errors will become visible.

Ah, just as all the memory-mishandling related security issues in all operating systems out there. Nobody tests their shit well enough nowadays!

You are quick with being judgemental and ignoring the rest of what I said in that part,

Quick??? Read all your other comments man! I take it as you not wanting to accept it.

well of course. you can’t betray the will of upstream: to not feed the rich. not a big ask.

but the user, as you said, has no reason to object to that, because it protects them from parasites

I suppose we need to make definitions clearer. C++ is memory safe in the sense that you can write memory safe code. It doesn’t enforce memory safety though. But not doing that is not the language’s fault. If someone jumps with a bike from a flying airplane, it’s not the bike’s fault that they will not land safely. It’s the misuse of the bike.

saying that C++ is memory safe because it’s possible to use it in a memory safe manner is like saying jumping out of a plane with the bike is safe, because it’s possible to safely land (with a parachute and a lot of training).

you always repeat that C++ is memory safe because its possible, and that “misuse” is “not its fault”.
first, you are quite simply redefining what does memory safety mean. you basically say bombs are safe because they can be safely defused with the expertise.
second, do you really need to misuse it to get unsafe code? it does not warn anywhere. not in the instructions, not in the compiler output.
third, its no one’s “fault” that c++ is not memory safe. That’s not a fault of c++. like its not a fault of factories that you have to wear safery gear when working inside because otherwise you may get injured more severely. this is just a property of C++, not a judgement

I’d argue those weren’t the best developers then.

oh no, my suspension was correct, you are really thinking that you are the perfect coder who jever makes any mistakes. It does not make sense to argue with you

deleted by creator

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memory_safety

https://www.memorysafety.org/docs/memory-safety/

https://media.defense.gov/2022/Nov/10/2003112742/-1/-1/0/CSI_SOFTWARE_MEMORY_SAFETY.PDF

https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/news/urgent-need-memory-safety-software-products

why do you want to redefine what the term means? why does it hurt to admit that C++ is not memory safe? It’s not about your weakness.

I don’t think this solely depends on the level of experience. People make mistakes, and these kinds of mistakes are very hard to find. And don’t tell me you are the perfect coder that makes no mistakes, introduces no bugs.

I don’t know if it’s riddled with it or not, but what I (think to) know is that one of Rust’s goal is to minimize them. No need for raw pointers when handling lists and buffers most of the time.

The GPL, on the other hand, directly infringes on the user’s freedom to fork and redistribute the software.

that’s plain bullshit. under GPL, you are free to fork it and redistribute it

and what happens then? land on a blacklist? for some that’s the best outcome

you whisky couldn’t solve tarpits completely. they may hold up the scrapers for less time, but they will still do that for the amount of the timeout

It’s Java but don’t be afraid, nowadays it also runs a chromium browser for your Markdown needs! a few years earlier it was done without that, but if course they had to fuck that up

I would think that if it had access to those in the discord app, it would still be able to do so in the web browser, but now it would ask for your permission.
I have never used such devices, but I assume that either they appear as normal audio source devices in the system, or voicemeeter makes one for them.

at the same time its ridiculous how limited voicemeeter is regarding the number of audio devices it can handle. its an artificial limit, even in the paid version

and what happens at boot time? when graphene code is not yet running

they cannot block what is internal. google does not need to be aware of your internal activities anyway

you can selectively mark mails as read that don’t need attention anymore, and keep as unread those that do. how would you do that with ntfy, or messaging services? at most you can mark unread a whole topic or chatroom

and no, I don’t want to make gitea issues for every single alert. (though… why not?). it would be very fragile anyway I would assume

I don’t have some objective reason personally, I just don’t like web apps for 90℅ of things.

me neither, but the discord app is a webapp just as well. the difference is that it runs its own browser engine, and so uses more system memory, and that it has free access to everything in your computer (and your local network), including your files, the audio devices, and lots more information on how you use it.

I’m curious does the web app allow for pass-through audio devices (an audio interface) or things like voicemeeter?

I’m not sure, I don’t understand what do you mean by pass through audio devices. what do you use it for?