The Pirate Bay’s rates haven’t changed for twenty years!

How to admit you don’t know what a calculator is without admitting it.

Not quite. If you know or shouldreasonabley believe someone is about to arrest you or sue you, depending on the circumstances, judges can tell juries to assume the erased data would show something bad. But it depends on the details.

Nothing is needed. Erase your shit before you travel in or out of the US.

FIFA is so dirty. All they do is rob hosting cities blind and then accept bribes. That organization needs to collapse. Sports should be affordable to watch, and who caves to Trump twice in one year anyway?

There are many kinds of corporations, my friend. Canonical is different from Apple. Wait a second… Wasn’t OS X built on FreeBSD?

Plenty of ways to ruin your life without a kid, too. Meh.

They want more money. Helping the user is only good if it makes money. Anyway, down votes give viewers more information, and probably YT wants to doctor the data in a way that downvotes block.

For example, I would always downvote AI content if allowed. So would countless others. But YT wants people to watch it, right? So they gotta suppress our negative feedback.

A friend of mine once remarked that a release structure significantly simpler than Debian’s is simply missing something important for at least one important use group.

That depends who you are. Do you mean “the average American” or perhaps “the US government looking to spend some money on private military-related expenses from your friend’s company” or perhaps “a politician who relies on pro-Israel funding”? … Those all have different answers.

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

Yeah this is a key point. It’s pretty safe to say that AI generated code that’s based on open source projects is going to be trained on open source projects. If the people running the AI software make any mistake then they could be facing massive copyright violations.

So I’m kind of interested in whether that type of risk is something that would be pragmatic for a company to take. There probably are some situations where it would be, but I’m not convinced that would happen too often.

Yes, of course. If you ignore current reality, then it’s not privacy invading…

You gotta think and read more about the actual issue here. The PR was pointless. The idea that Linux could ever comply is absurd. It’s open source. It’s international. Nobody cares about Colorado law.

Noble intent? If so, lurk moar ffs.

Hahaha the joke’s on us, cuz we don’t own property, sigh.

Oh my friend, you can replace open source with AI. You can do it, especially if you don’t care about the consequences…

Obviously we all have our own opinions and good for us but it’s fairly obvious that if you’re using something that’s been around for 10 or 20 years it’s probably gonna be okay. So good for you. The Super New Disros are ones where you probably want to pay more attention before adopting them. But some of them are pretty good too, I would imagine.