• chris@l.roofo.cc
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    27 days ago

    What? No! Driving faster is not safer. What kind of logic is that? If someone does something dangerous because I drive the speed limit they are unsafe not me.

    • A_Chilean_Cyborg@feddit.cl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      27 days ago

      Murrican logic.

      Buing a bigger car is also safer according to them, even if then it turns 99% blindspot.

    • MonkRome@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      27 days ago

      Certainly it is safer if everyone everyone drives the speed limit, lowering the speed of traffic. But that’s not realistically what happens. I’m talking about when you are around other cars that are all going over the limit. The difference in speed between vehicles is also dangerous. When you drive slower than traffic you become a hazard and bottleneck that raises the danger of everyone near you. Better to be alive than “right”.

      The title is clickbait, its really about difference in speed: https://seasia.co/2025/09/05/driving-slower-is-actually-more-dangerous-than-driving-fast

      Challenge your assumptions.

      • chris@l.roofo.cc
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        27 days ago

        So the article says the problem are people that won’t follow the rules. People who overtake and go way too fast. I will not enable their behavior.

        • MonkRome@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          27 days ago

          Nowhere in the article does it say that. Your ego is more important than your own life or the life of others, that tracks with both of your comments.

          the core insight remains widely accepted in traffic engineering: deviation from the average traffic speed, especially on high-speed roads, is a significant risk factor.

          • chris@l.roofo.cc
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            27 days ago

            It doesn’t say that. You are right. What it says is that the dangers come from people overtaking and assuming that someone is faster. It has nothing to do with ego and only with adhering to the law. I don’t want a speeding ticket because someone else what’s to be faster.

            Everyone who overtakes me when I am at the speed limit is an idiot in my eye. People could just follow the law. Then the average speed would be the legal speed limit.

    • Talcosis@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      27 days ago

      I remember reading a story a while back. Couple lumberjacks had a serious accident, so while one guy was bleeding out in the back seat, the driver was doing 100+ and the third guy was on the phone with the cops trying to get a police escort.

      They ran into a Karen like you, who decided to make sure they went the speed limit. Guy in the back seat died as a result.

      • Armok_the_bunny@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        27 days ago

        You know, and I know you know, that that’s never what is meant by saying it’s “safer to travel at the speed of traffic”. It’s tragic to be sure, but it’s not a counter argumement against obeying the law.

        • Talcosis@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          27 days ago

          It is safer to travel at the speed of traffic. The guy I responded to clearly said that he would rather be a rolling roadblock following speed limits like an idiot, instead of travelling with traffic.

      • chris@l.roofo.cc
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        27 days ago

        The fuck you talking about? I never said I’d actively block anyone from overtaking me and the traffic won’t flow at 100mph. So what the fuck is your point? Start turning on your brain before calling me a Karen.

        • Talcosis@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          27 days ago

          No, you said you believed going the speed limit was always safer than going with the flow of traffic.

          Not only are you a Karen, you’re a particularly stupid one.

          • chris@l.roofo.cc
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            26 days ago

            You are not very good at making a logical argument, are you? You cite an example of a vehicle needing to go over 100mph for an emergency, which firstly doesn’t happen very often and secondly doesn’t fucking flow with the traffic either.

            Then you called me a Karen because in your mind you made up a scenario where this would happen in my vicinity and I’d be blocking that car whichni wouldn’t do willingly but unwillingly probably do anyways even if I’d go with the flow because 100+ mph is not the normal fucking flow of traffic.

            Your argument was so bad that I considered blocking you but I wanted to see if you might have an epiphany but I am losing hope. You seem to be having too much fun making up fantasy scenarios where someone dies because I drive the speed limit.