I present to you: blindly plugging a SCART in the back of our monolith of a TV… Harder than aligning an HDMI and it would shock me from time to time for some reason, while feeling around to find the socket
According to wikipedia you can use a USB up to 240w, a TV will def not use that much power
Thought, it would probably have 2 different USBs, one for display and one for power which i am hating, i already see from 1km the people mistaking the ports and messing shit up
To be fair thats probably easier than blindly plugging in hdmi, its like usb but so much worse
I present to you: blindly plugging a SCART in the back of our monolith of a TV… Harder than aligning an HDMI and it would shock me from time to time for some reason, while feeling around to find the socket
USB-C has a DP-alt mode, so it can feed DisplayPort signals through that connector.
DisplayPort can speak HDMI too, so cheap passive adaptors and straight through cables are possible from DisplayPort connectors.
So a USB-C port can fling HDMI signals and theoretically a tv can have usb-c ports for everything except maybe power which would exceed spec.
I don’t know if I hate this idea or not.
Wouldn’t the audio get lost with passive ones?
According to wikipedia you can use a USB up to 240w, a TV will def not use that much power
Thought, it would probably have 2 different USBs, one for display and one for power which i am hating, i already see from 1km the people mistaking the ports and messing shit up