• jj4211@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    16 days ago

    Based on my AI enthusiast colleagues, I totally believe 100x productive.

    100 x 0 == 0

  • Trump Rapes Kids@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    16 days ago

    100x productivity boost? Then you must be working much less, and still making much more, right? Doesn’t even need to reach that 100x figure, even say half the work hours and 2-3x the pay or 1/4 the work hours for the same pay would be great.

  • Farid@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    16 days ago

    I now start and abandon x10 more hobby projects every year, so yeah, my productivity is definitely up.

  • zxqwas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    16 days ago

    Generally people choose to work the same hours even when their productivity goes up because the opportunity cost of not working an hour goes up too

  • Airfried@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    16 days ago

    “No Padme. I will be out of the job and fill repositories with my vibe coded slop free of charge.”

    • marcos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      16 days ago

      If the original phrase was true and the market for software was saturated, the point would be that more productive people would outcompete you out of your job. The correct answer is to either get the most productivity possible so you’ll end up a little richer, or switch careers.

      But both the original phrase is a lie and the market for software is nowhere close saturation.

  • makeshift0546@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    16 days ago

    I work less these days with a bump of productivity and I’ll be getting a sizable bump in salary eoy🤷‍♂️

    Win win in my situation for the moment.