• 20 Posts
  • 399 Comments
Joined 7 months ago
cake
Cake day: February 17th, 2026

help-circle




  • OP, I’ve tried your experiment with Invidious + Tor browser. I’ve watched some vids about cooking. Then restarted Tor. Went back to the same Invidious instance. It didn’t show me any of what I watched. I got just the default vids for that instance.

    Hard to say what might be doing that for you. So, afraid I can’t be of much more help about that :(

    just how to get webisites to stop knowing everything i do across multiple identities and every device i use

    It’s very hard. Unfortunately. You’re up against the best data scientists in the world. And up against a legion of identity brokers. Believe me they are very very clever. If there is ANY way to deduce ppl’s idenity they will find and exploit it.

    I won’t say it’s impossible to do. But it’s one of those probs, where you have to block every method. They only need a single method you missed. On top of that, many sites won’t even let you in at all, if the identity broker server they use behind the scenes can’t peg your IRL ID with a threshold of confidence.



  • In one video, a student even filmed himself dropping his smartphone into one of the pouches that schools use to confiscate phones during class — suggesting that smart glasses are being used by students in spaces where teachers are seeking to limit electronic devices.

    Gee! Who could possibly have seen that coming… I mean, clearly there was no way for anyone to imagine such a possibility!! And certainly not a company who employs teams of psychologists!

    Glassholes aside -> top photo is a stock image. But I’ve seen lots of times where well meaning ppl try to anonymize a photo with black-bars over eyes like that, or a blur that can be reversed like spirals or w/e. Maybe that was effective long ago. Today, with such powerful FR tech, that won’t do the job.

    I want to see a huge culture shift. Where we have huge peer pressure against ever u/l’ing somebody without their consent. Ever.


  • A shame they don’t ship to or build in Canada

    I was about to say “Yet. US & Canada cooperate on car regulations, so it’s trivial to support both markets”.

    But, web says the tariff situation got in the way, and Slate has no plans for it. Ugh. That sucks :(. Hopefully sanity will be restored eventually, and it’ll become possible again.

    I want a better timeline please.




  • This is good. Humor is surprisingly effective in getting others on-side.

    The article has another link, I can only read a little, but it’s funny,

    Protesting Flock, Arizona Man Presents Plan to Surveil Government Official

    “I’ve spent the last several months talking to people all over Casa Grande, and one thing keeps coming up: Safety. So, today I’m excited to announce a new company called Shepherd Safety,” he said. “Our mission is simple. Keep government officials and their families safe.” It would be no different than how the city monitors its citizens using Flock cameras, he said.

    He said he’d already started compiling profiles on their vehicles, spouses vehicles, children’s vehicles, and planned to combine that data with Bluetooth signals, advertising IDs, and commercial data sources, “so our authorized users can replay the movements of every government official and their immediate family,” he said. Local businesses would be invited to join the network, to “protect” officials while they shop, eat at restaurants […]


  • Has this occurred to y’all?

    All. Of. The. Damn. Time.

    The more private you try to be, the more you will hit those.

    I see a couple diff behaviors. Sometimes, it succeeds and it lets me through. Sometimes, it “succeeds” but gets in an endless reload loop of the cloudflare page, and never forwards to the site. Sometimes, it convinces itself I am a robot and blocks me entirely.

    No idea what drives that diff. Maybe there’s some kind of threshold sites can set, or sth like that.

    I have much better luck getting past the non-cloudflare bot verifiers. There are some competitors, I forgot the names now.



  • OK, arguably. But I would not suggest to approach your friends like that, to get them off it!

    If our goal is to move people off privacy invading tech, we can get more flies with honey than vinegar. If we approach ppl like, you’re an idiot! Well it’s just human psychology. Ppl entrench against you. They are much less likely to listen.

    We can get better results to come at them in a positive way. Be patient, explain the probs. Explain the future risks of big G controlling all browsers, and by extension, de-facto web standards. Give ppl alternatives. Point them to good online explanations of why not to use Chrome.

    We’re in an info overload world. Most ppl don’t have any idea about any of this stuff.



  • even the vaccine crazies have valid skepticism

    No, they really don’t. To be extremely clear, it is nearly unanimous from every expert that there is no valid reason not to get vaccinated, and lots of very good reasons to do it. That is the consensus of the entire field. Immunologists, virologists, public health officials, in every country. It is as contentious in the medical community as saying the earth is round, not flat among geologists. Which is to say you can probably find a flat earther geologist or two. But they are crackpots.

    All this "I believe in it buuuuut does is make people falsely hesitant about something that is the scientific consensus.



  • the more you realize the paranoid delusions people used to call “crazy schizo shit” are actually probably true

    That’s one of my biggest peeves. Pre-surveilance economy, the crazies really were paranoid. There were not cameras in their walls! Then, the whole ass world went, “Hey! What if we make their paranoia into actual reality?” Now, here we are. Maybe not cameras in the walls, but in every other damn thing. Your vacuum? Check. Your car? Check. Kids toys? Check. Sunglasses? Check.

    That’s made it harder to tell the diff between ppl who are actually paranoid (“vaccines are implanting Bill Gates tracking chips in your veins bro!”) and those who aren’t, but hate commercial surveilence. Plus, those who hate it, sound almost like an oldschool paranoid, to anyone who doesn’t pay attention to know how pervasive it is now.

    It’s a fucked timeline, I’ll tell ya what.




  • Heck robots.txt doesn’t even seem to be honored!

    Eh. I make web pages for friends and family. We don’t want them indexed. In my server logs, most of the big scrapers are pretty good about honoring robots.txt. Google does. Meta does. At least some the AI scrapers do. Pretty sure Bytedance does too but I’d have to double check.

    I’ll see a hit from let’s say G’s bot, fetching robots.txt, and then no other activity. For all the thigns I can shit on G and Meta for, this isn’t one of them.

    Is it universal to heed it? Nah, ofc not. But it’s still more effective than you’d think, given it is voluntary.