You fix that by not using gnome. Or butchering gnome with enough extensions to functionally be a reverse lobotomy.
Since gnomes entirely shitck is that you don’t get to decide how gnome works. It’s out of the box or fuck off.
It’s why it needs a billion extension and mods to be remotely functional
To be fair, adoption as a concept is the problem not the actual aur.
The fundamentals of the aur was fine though that entire ordeal. It’s just one optional choice layered on top that wasn’t
Blaming the aur fundamentally for that choice is like blaming the city planner for when a idiot turns down the wrong way on a one way street.
We kinda just accepted the risk because the upsides were worth it. But some people are assholes and gotta ruin it for everyone.
Mint breaks weirdly often but also it’s inconsistent in my experience. It’s a great example of it explodes for some people and others it’s a god like entity of perfection. Never in-between. Lol
And that fresh install can also just fuck up. Have you never had a clean install go screwy? I know I sure the fuck have a few times over the years.
I’ve had bazzite kill it self twice so far on an update.
That’s literally every distro ever. Fuck even debian can break on an update. Things happen.
I didn’t know ancient China a historically divine mandane ruled nation of warring tribes of dynasties had eletrtions.
Are you fucking stupid? It’s a stand in for ancient China not modern China you moron. It literally is a monarchy based on divine mandante.
You have more faith in humanity than me. Thanks for being a good example of being a better persons.
Those devices also don’t get updated, touched or fucked with. So any changes to newer kernels matter as much as as the answer to what fucking dirt taste like.
It literally doesn’t. So being mad at the removal is fucking retarded.
It’s easy to understand. They are objectively fucking stupid and like to be outraged for the sake of it. That or they are literally trolls
These people are literally not worth any amount of effort to pay attention to if they are the former and if they are the latter then remember rule 1. Don’t feed the trolls.
It’s because of the adjective order. You grow up hearing everyone else use the same common adjective order. In this case it should be size shape color than condition.
Overall it would be opinion size, age shape, color, origin material purpose.
Because everyone uses that same adjective order as a child. You picked up on that so consciously and then adopted that style. There’s nothing that actually prevents you from mixing that up. There’s no rule or some sort of quirk of English that will break if you change that order.
You’re just not used to any other way so it sounds weird.
But changing that order won’t create any sort of confusion or loss of understanding. It’ll just make you have to actively think about something thus slowing you down. We’re doing it the way that everyone does it subconsciously is faster because you don’t have to actively think of it.
So by default you will always choose the fastest way to communicate. Because that’s going to require the least amount of thought for both yourself and the other party.
But again there is no reason you can’t change it.
The only real issue I can think of is if you do change it on purpose it would create an emphasis because you’re breaking a normality. Cuz people just subconsciously assume you go from subjective to objective when it comes to adjectives.
And changes to the standard stand out and thus create points of interest. But again, even that is still not a hard syntax rule.
English doesn’t really have a lot of hard rules. You can f*** with it real hard and it won’t break. Though you may sound very funny!.
Just because they are single doesn’t mean they don’t understand what they are talking about. Just like being in one doesn’t mean they understand anything either.
I’ve known more people in my life in a relationship that couldn’t give fucking anything remotely close to healthy advice, then single people that could give you the best advice you could want.
There are more codependent people who chase a relationship no matter how toxic or unhealthy they are. Then there are actually sane, reasonable people who have their shit figured out either single or in a relationship.
No they don’t. Only the shitty ones do.
There’s nothing intellectual about lemmy. It’s barely one step above reddit before the api fuck up.
Which is to say it’s fucking stupid as fuck.
It’s authenticity stupid as fuck tho. Which is a hell of a lot better then generated stupid as fuck.
The fuck does the gym have to do with a movie theater?! How the actual fuck did you go form A to Q like that.
That’s pretty much a unique problem of only chat gpt. Actually, the more I look into things the more I realize almost every stereotype about how stupid or a sycophanty llms are it’s almost always just a chat GPT problem.
That thing is just basically told to be the most kiss ass little twat it possibly can be.
Pretty much every other LLM will just kind of roll with the punches, assuming you’re telling a story or playing a game or something if you tell it something nonsensical. But if you actually like push on it and be like no, I did it in real life factually it’ll be like no that’s impossible. Explain how that happened.
Even my little s***** local llm manages to pass that test while chatgpt fails which is wild.
And to be fair, every llm is stupid. They’re all dumb little stateless machines making their best guesses. But it really is wild. How much chat GPT is told and set up to basically to suck dick to keep its customers happy and coming back.
This actually made me wonder, I went and tested like 10 different llms. Almost all of them straight up called it out as impossible but where willing to play along with a “fantasy”.
The only ones that failed were chatgpt and a bunch of old local models. Even after clarifying to got I was being serious that I “walked around the earth in one min” it didn’t realize that was impossible. It was hell bent on being a sycophant.
Honestly this “problem” really hasn’t been true in the way you are trying to frame it for a good while. LLMs can’t tell if your joking or being serious from a single one sentence prompt.
For all it knows your playing a game. So it just rolls with it, after all they are stateless.
They are as much about “creative” writing and fiction as they are facts and nonfiction.
This is the internet you can say asshole on the internet.
The other chat is really f****** easy. Every chat is a unique instance.
Go get a piece of paper and write a word on it now go get another piece of paper and write a word on that one.
Do both piece of papers have both words on them? No, they don’t. They’re unique instances.
If you don’t load previous information into the new chat, then it’s not going to have that information to reference. You’re resetting to zero every single time.
If you are using an llm that doesn’t have this preset up as a built-in function, then you’re using a s***** LLM. You shouldn’t have to set this up yourself at this point.
The only thing you should have to do is tell it what you want in the memory. It should have a preset up system to be able to handle the rest itself.
The first time I’ve ever been impressed with any of the AIs has been Claude 4.8 opus.
It’s also the first I ever saw an ai tell me I was actively being stupid and wrong and it proactively was able to prove it with out being a sycophant bitch.
Gpt has always been the worst of the big ais as far as I’m concerned. It’s just dog shit.
Even still impressed by Claude is like saying I was impressed by a 5th grader. It’s something but it ain’t much.
Literally every distro ever even Debian. Has broken user space on updates. It just happens. It’s a fact of life. If your distro hasnt done it to you at least once you are either very new to Linux or you are lying though your teeth.