

I’d refer to Tibet and the 9-dash fiasco. I’m not terribly versed in maritime law, but it feels shady to me.


I’d refer to Tibet and the 9-dash fiasco. I’m not terribly versed in maritime law, but it feels shady to me.


Thanks, I’ve been reading up on the increasing cover arguments to the Uyghur discussion. However, does that also apply to their activities in Tibet?


I’m well aware of their growth and successes in economy, technology and growing presence in geopolitics. Earlier comment from me was about human rights abuses and international law. How do China’s successes in other areas suddenly absolve their disregard for law and rights?
Same goes for the US - their military might is definitely recognized, along with their status as a superpower. This doesn’t give them the right to disregard law and rights. You seem to be biased towards China. But in terms of human rights and international law, how do they both fare?
No where in the thread has the topic of economic success come into play. Why have you suddenly inserted it like it’s relevant?
If you say that lifting people out of poverty gives them ‘points’ towards human rights, not only is this a terrible rationale, this doesn’t give them any points to then spend towards their abused in the likes of Tibet and the Uyghurs.


They have alot in common with regards to their disregard for international law and human rights.


Not very repairable. 3/10


As does USA, and continues to do so against it’s own native people. Usa and China are not so different.
Maybe it’s more about certain clients that pay for dedicated development of certain capabilities into the libre system? E.g. some printer company paying for direct printer compatibility? (Bad example probably)
Be the change you want to see. Guillotines can be rendered airborne.
Well I think he achieved as much as can be done - brought to light the abuses of the gumint. It was up to the people to decide what to do with that information. Most, including you clearly, just didn’t care that everyone’s rights were, and are (even moreso today) being completely discarded.
It wasn’t on him to bring the abusers to justice or correct the system. That’s on the system. If it fails, it’s on the people to fix it.


What’s the expected BOM cost?
So you could rename all your programs to start with a specific letter to call it and bypass this bug, but you’re limited to 26 or so (depending on your language settings and keyboard) unique programs.
Oh man that’s also terrible. Or a great way to launch 15 programs just by swiping through a list.
Why would it ever launch programs before a user has finished specifying? How would one ever run anything other than calculator?


Also PSA because I was confused: euro office is a fork of only office, of potentially Russian origin, whilst libre office is a fork of open office, of likely non Russian origin.
For those who care.


Man it took me 3 days of re-reading to only now realize that there is OPENoffice that is forked to libre office, and ONLYoffice, which has strong russian origins.
Til that only-office is even a thing. Far too easy to misread when I wasn’t expecting only as a prefix to office. I’m sure I’m not the only one that got tripped up.
Also PSA: euro office isn’t a standalone offline office suite - it’s web based and doesn’t run standalone. Needs next cloud and quite a bit of setup to allow for that M$365 ‘experience’.
Cash has unique id to reach bill, which can be logged on withdrawal, final point of reentry system can be logged. Of course, everything in between is unclear. But with enough re-entries at various points in time, a fuzzy picture is possible. Especially with multiple sources of withdrawals going through a common mid point.


Isn’t libre also a fork of open?
Let’s be specific - in what way should the intolerance of fascists manifest?
I would also put all my personal logins, and passwords in plaintext. Together with a copy of the entire corporate SharePoint as backup. I’ll keep it connected to am unsecured network like the local McDonald’s as well.