Haha, yes this is the subtle difference.

Also money can be spent responsibly by companies.

Mint or ubuntu are classics, you won’t make a mistake choosing either.

Ah ok, thats where you were coming from. Thanks for clearing this up :

afaik its questionably centered on self-hosting, although anonymous might be called an advocate of digital rights. The title is a bit mysterious, but it is kind of fitting to the text and not “cherry picking”. It just is not very informative, either.

Whats with the downvotes? As far as i can see this is legit.

It’s like getting children. You only know afterwards how it really feels and even if it’s a hassle sometimes you wouldn’t ever change back.

I almost came reading this rant. Thanks for bringing this so much more eloquently to the point.

And every company that is relying on gsm or the apple pendant to verify anything.

Cromite sounds nice. Well, aside the fact users stand out from the rest because of using a exotic browser. But nonetheless that seems like i should give it a try.

If shared hosting isn’t a problem Uberspace might be interesting. I used it as long as i didn’t solely self host.

Systems that are put into place will get misused or it’s initial usage will get softened, loosened and then for some safety stuff re-purposed (protection of children, protection against terrorism). If it’s there already why not use it for more than just some age verification.

It’s so cruel that we debate this mainly so that network traffic can get attributed to natural persons and this is gold++ for marketing.

Alpine Linux might also be interesting.

Thats the spirit xD

Here is a list of apps that don’t work.

https://grapheneos.org/articles/attestation-compatibility-guide#apps-banning-grapheneos

Ah yeah. You’re right. There ist this one question mark in between thats i oversaw at first. Either way, i wanted to hint to you thats maybe your post doesn’t get perceived as a question much…

Is this a question?

HaHa

Nice point if view. Ironically we live in times when minding others boundaries is almost common sense. Abusive behavior gets public contempt. But everyone is just accepting manipulative, malicious and intrusive ads.

Maybe there is, maybe it’s only little. Maybe people browsing should be more aware of where they click on. Either way, this method shouldn’t be used for any sensitive information least a personal cloud. Would be suicidal I guess.

Yeah, they want VPN for themselves to watch their CSAM. And to fight CSAM you have to let government sedan all your data and communication.