• 0 Posts
  • 165 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: February 7th, 2025

help-circle
  • I think that’s the distinction between an expert using a tool diligently and responsibly, and a lazy person using it haphazardly as a crutch.

    If that tool ever gets ripped out from under you, you’ll possibly suffer a loss in performance, but you’ll still be able to perform and do your job.

    If their crutch is kicked out, they’ll crash.




  • Linux has made great strides to being approachable for new users. The agony of choice for so many things (distro, editor, nearly any tool family with more than one option) and the factionalism around the options is probably one of the few big obstacles left.

    I don’t have a solution for the factionalism. I’d put forth a suggestion for a simple “standard” choice (Kate/gedit for GUI and nano for CLI; I personally use vim, but I think nano is more approachable) but I’m sure someone will disagree and we’re back to square one.



  • Let’s add dialects to the mess:

    While not written in “book” German*, colloquial German may feature des, dat, det or dit instead of das, shorten der to dr or elide parts (like the French l’, except it may be attached to the previous word): Das ist das Problem mit der deutschen Sprache -> Des isch’s Problem mit dr deutscha Sproach

    (“That is the problem with the German language.” Bonus: notice how the demonstrative pronoun “that” is also
    das? Just in case you were hoping it was restricted to “the”…)

    * Hochdeutsch or Standarddeutsch (“High German” or “Standard German”), originally a written form slowly evolved over centuries to be most widely understood and has since been formalised. Informally, the term is also used for a spoken counterpart properly called Bühnendeutsch (“Stage German”), which isn’t always quite as “pure”, hence my distinction.

    I bloody love my language.








  • It’s not who gets to run it, but who they get to interact with that’s the bad part, without even telling them makes it worse.

    Using software made by people who hate you and are willing to put that hate into their code is a bad idea for sure. If their software seeks to isolate you from communities and people that believe you have a right to exist, what’s left?




  • luciferofastora@feddit.orgtomemes@lemmy.worldHow do you feel?
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    There’s a weird dynamic to arguing online, particularly when it comes to political topics. Most of the time, you won’t convince your counterpart. Maybe some point sticks with them later and you’ll never know, but either way they’re not really the target of the arguments. It’s the (potential) audience that the argument is supposed to be for: People less emotionally invested in the conflict may take away something useful from the arguments, people on the fence about an issue might come around to your point, and people sharing your opinion will see that they’re not alone and feel affirmed.

    Essentially, it’s a performance on an public stage for the sake of discourse. Phrased strongly, you don’t want “the other side” to dominate the public opinion, so you engage them. In the process, you may hone your own arguments, or you may find them wanting, perhaps even see them start to crack.





  • Valve invented the “we can violate copyright laws because it’s on a computer”

    That stunt was invented by the music industry first. It was a hit with publishers. Valve helped the publishers do the same shit with video games and it’s still awful, but they weren’t the inventors.

    It boils down to the same issues of predatory copyright laws that have been perverted into a twisted mockery of the good intentions they were initially supposed to serve.