funner fact: anubis itself is slop
funner fact: anubis itself is slop


oudated and unmaintained software… like openrc, with a commit 3 weeks ago? or dinit with a commit 3 days ago?
installing wine with pacman doesn’t allow any special access. if you run it, then it gets access to whatever the user who ran it has access to. whether you installed it with pacman or a gui wrapper doesn’t matter.
seems like i took the bait, nice one. but considering that i’ve met people who argued that “a linux computer can’t be secure without flatpak” i’d put nothing past flatpak fans at this point.
…did that ever happen to you with healthy maintained software? i’d be quite curious to know, because it did not happen to me.
on the other hand, my image viewer doesn’t need a 300 megabyte runtime and i can launch it by its name and not by “flatpak run org.whatever.softwarename”. and as a bonus it’s dynamically linked too.
makes using it much more convenient


the backup wouldn’t be encrypted but you can use luks to encrypt the backup drive too, the same way as you’d do with a drive in your computer.
i use rsync to send off my /home to an encrypted backup drive and restoring it you just reverse the source and destination and copy the stuff back.
iOS has their own attestation/anti-tamper api similar to google’s integrity api so that’s going to be used instead. the only difference is that on iOS you’ll need to download extra software specifically for this.
graphene devs said you can do it with their sandboxed version of gms but as far as i know that still involves having an account and handing over all your personal info to google.