Closing > for the tag is left as an exercise for the reader. unwarranted is a property of the rage tag (the properties are declared before the tag name)
This… This isn’t something you can actually do in HTML is it? I’ve been doing web development for years and I feel like I’m about to learn some horrifically cursed knowledge…
The real answer is that when I closed the tags, they didn’t show up in the comment. So I left them open, because it looked utterly ridiculous. But I like your interpretation way better!
deleted by creator
Closing
>for the tag is left as an exercise for the reader.unwarrantedis a property of theragetag (the properties are declared before the tag name)This… This isn’t something you can actually do in HTML is it? I’ve been doing web development for years and I feel like I’m about to learn some horrifically cursed knowledge…
Nope, it’s a CHTML extension. C for cursed, although that’s redundant.
HTML goes <br>
oh thank fuck
I’m not sure if that’s a “machine goes brrrrrr” joke or not. If it is, it’s brilliant. XD
Lmao that’s great
The real answer is that when I closed the tags, they didn’t show up in the comment. So I left them open, because it looked utterly ridiculous. But I like your interpretation way better!
Probably needed to escape them with \