Two years into full-time Linux and I’m finally burning the distro-hopping cycle. I fell for the Arch/AUR trap for a while, but I got tired of spending my weekends debugging file manager crashes instead of maintaining my home lab.

Switched back to Fedora, and it’s boring in exactly the way I need it to be. It’s a stable launchpad for my projects, not the project itself.

    • Spice Hoarder@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Bazzite is just right for my daily driver. I was hopping around different arch distros for a while, but I had some really weird encounters with btrfs and not being able to recover after kernel upgrades. Happened to me 3 times in the span of 2 years.

    • esperal@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yes ! I don’t get why debian always seems to be forgotten distro outside of its server use. I have been running it for 2 years now (homelab, laptop and desktop).

      • throwaway403@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 month ago

        Beyond none of its branches actually satisfying my preferences, I feel like the way it handles major version upgrades is way too involved. I suppose it makes sense; it’s paying back the accumulated debt of a couple years worth of bliss…

        Having said that, my experience on Fedora Atomic is (almost) equally blissful without requiring any of that whenever a major version update strikes.

        Don’t get me wrong; I definitely do believe Debian has its uses on desktop Linux. But I can’t shake off the feeling that they’re definitely more niche compared to say Fedora.

      • SusanoStyle@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I love Debian, I use it as a desktop and it’s installed on all my machines, but it has some problems/quirks that make it hard to recommend it for desktop usage.

        First one is that it doesn’t have sensible defaults, the OS expects a user who is an admin, one who will configure things to their liking. I would consider this to be a feature, if it weren’t for the second problem, the documentation. The documentation is wayy too dated, lots of pages in the wiki haven’t been updated since Debian Buster days!

        A better recommendation would be probably a Debian derivative like MX Linux. They are more opinionated, but as far as I know it, they come with better defaults and offer newer guides, documentation, etc.

      • IrritableOcelot@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Debian is nice & boring, but I have had issues with how old its kernel and software versions are. 6.12 isn’t too bad for Trixie, but previously it was really terrible. When I was running Bookworm, I ran into plenty of situations where software I was compiling or getting from outside the repos (for niche software), wasn’t backwards compatible to the library versions Debian provided.

        No hate for Debian, but it just doesn’t work for a lot of people. However, these days I would go for Debian over Ubuntu 10 times out of 10.

      • Victor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        If you like to fiddle, I might suggest Arch. 😁 Hit me up if you want help with getting started!

        • Allero@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          CachyOS is Arch with a few tweaks, some of which are hard to do by yourself.

          • Victor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Fair enough. I thought it was one of those distros that you couldn’t change much once installed. My bad, if incorrect.

            • Allero@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 month ago

              You probably think of Bazzite. Same gaming focus, but on immutable base, also very popular :)

  • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 month ago

    I have been on this Linux jam since 1996 with a CD copy of Red Hat that came with a magazine (Byte, maybe?). In 2018 I made the jump to Debian based distros specifically because I got tired of the surprises. Now my lab runs LMDE. The only thing more stable and boring is Debian Stable itself.

    Like you said, I want to focus on my projects, not have the OS be my project.

    • kuiskaaja@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      it’s kind of strange hearing about all this stability and everything on debian stable (and lmde by extension), when it was constantly broken for me and i had to do all kinds of weird fixes

      i have a lenovo thinkpad t490s too so it’s not like im running on brand new components or anything either

      been running fedora kde for a few months and it’s been running like a dream

        • kuiskaaja@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          it is!

          i’m wondering if i have some special version of the t490s cus thinkpads are supposed to co-operate well with linux

          fastfetch says the host is “20NYS0FU00 (ThinkPad T490s)” if that rings a bell to anyone

    • EastofEdson@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      My first Linux distro was Red Hat 6 around 1996 I would suspect. It came with a Linux book that I bought.

      • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I am pretty sure I started with either Halloween or Mother’s Day because Red Hat Linux for Dummies came with Red Hat 2.1 which I am pretty sure came out in 96 or 97. I know Red Hat 6 was released in 1999, because I was neck deep in Y2K work at the time I installed it on my Compaq laptop.

        • EastofEdson@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          I found the O’Reilly Red Hat 6 book online and it came out in August 1999. I would have pegged it earlier than that but I guess not.

    • NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 month ago

      Fedora is solid these days, well the last few years. It’s been so easy and everything is up to date, not lagging behind lke Ubuntu.

      Ubuntu been awful since the beginning, always buggy always needing to be rinstalled at some point.

      It lives on hype alone. I would choose anything over Ubuntu.

    • Allero@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Fedora recently provided some exciting developments in the Linux world, and it’s genuinely interesting to follow.

      It’s also reasonably new and reasonably stable, which is often so much of a pain point to balance.

      Also, I mean, it is the distro Linus himself prefers.

      • Mistiy@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        Linus liking something doesn’t mean anything. He has some other strange opinions too.

        • Allero@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Sure, and it’s not about liking. It’s about being damn sure Fedora will keep up with Linux development.

          Linus is not the one to distro-hop, and you can be sure that his workstation will be perfectly operational and up to date with Linux development. And therefore, yours can probably be too.

    • brax@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      I don’t get it, but I also haven’t used Fedora since like 2007. I settled on Ubuntu for a while then jumped ship to Arch, and maybe for the first time I haven’t been wondering where I’d go to next because something frustrated me with the os lol

  • YurkshireLad@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 month ago

    I also settled on fedora with kde but the fans in my laptop keep spinning up every few seconds, even when locked. It’s very annoying.

    • aim4harmony@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Is your computer Lenovo by chance? I experience the same with my Lenovo laptop. I could figure out some tweqks to calm it down a little bit, but it’s still running quite often despite a minimal load.

  • SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Debian for servers and fedora for desktop for me.

    Some people I will put on Mint for desktop use, if they are super non-technical.

    • feannag@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I love mint and I’m at least a little technical. Although I’m still mad I couldn’t get fedora working on my laptop.

        • feannag@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          The live USB would boot, but the install would fail. It was my only computer at the time, so I needed it up and working and couldn’t really troubleshoot. In fairness, ASUS is not known for it’s Linux support.

            • feannag@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              Interesting! I’ll have to check it out. I’m a little wary of immutable distros though. I do a fair amount of tinkering and random package installs. And I dont love flatpak.

              • SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 month ago

                They are not as restrictive as people make them out to be.

                You can have a look at distro shelf. It allows you to run a container for any other distro, install packages and then export those apps to run like native apps. I use it all the time when something is only supported via package and not flatpack, or some other distro only.

                The container still maps to your same home folder for file and config access.

  • Allero@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Back to Fedora myself.

    My path so far: Manjaro -> Arch -> Mint -> Fedora -> EndeavourOS -> OpenSUSE Tumbleweed -> Bazzite -> Fedora.

    All distros on the list are brilliant in their own right, they just failed on my hardware in all variety of odd ways, or were simply too limited for what I want to do. Of all of them, Fedora was the least problematic in the long run, and with the snapshot experience I gained from OpenSUSE, I think I can manage it well now.

    P.S. Seems like the article author also got inspiration for btrfs after using OpenSUSE, and I don’t think it’s random. Folks there made a truly perfect integration. If you want to know what btrfs can truly offer, look no further, this is the best use of this filesystem anywhere on Linux.

  • roundabout@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    I just swapped over yesterday to Fedora from Ubuntu. It’s been a good experience so far! Except for installing nvidia drivers, still working on that

    • Victor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Why do distros make that so difficult?

      # pacman -S nvidia
      # systemctl reboot
      

      Good to go. 🚀

      • MummifiedClient5000@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        Fedora doesn’t ship proprietary NVIDIA drivers in its official repos and doesn’t include 3rd party repos with proprietary software either. This is for licensing and I guess philosophical reasons. Arch has a different approach. That’s why.

    • tla@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Shouldn’t be difficult. Add the rpmfusion repo and install drivers (with akmods that handles everything when the driver / kernel updates). Instructions on the rpmfusion web site. After that, setup dnf-automatic and you’re done.

  • Nibodhika@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    I fell for the Arch/AUR trap for a while, but I got tired of spending my weekends debugging file manager crashes instead of maintaining my home lab.

    What sort of file manager crashes were you having?