Do modern file systems actually remove it from disk? It’s been a while since I did any forensics and didn’t do much of it, but I remember being able to batch restore files from inodes as long as that part of the disk hadn’t been overwritten. That’s why you’re supposed to overwrite disks with random data if you want to data gone.

Don’t forget to make Liu Kang noises while you do it.

Even though I’ve never seen it before, it still seems familiar. 🥁🥁🛎️

Shaka when the walls fell.

Ah, I never played in the NBA. They don’t have that rule in Olympic basketball.

Which I also have never played in.

Flippers is not on offense, 3 second rule does not apply.

Reminds me of https://mountainmoonvolcano.tumblr.com/post/66762332783

If you meet the Buddha on the road, kill him.

The one near me has burlesque performances that get pretty animated.

Bigots love Jesus.

Well that was only slightly faster than expected.

Does that mean I’ll be able to opt my theoretical children out of hetero content, too, though?

Happy birthday! 🎉

Do you know any billionaires that don’t?

Not sure if you’re just looking for a fight, but I’m not comparing. I’m pointing out that the Taliban is not an admirable group. I think praising a group that persecutes lgbtq+ people in an lgbtq+ community is really fucking tacky.

I’m not sure I’d count their country as free…

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_rights_in_Afghanistan

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treatment_of_women_by_the_Taliban

And I think persecuting minorities and women in a theocracy is exactly the kind of thing the GOP is successfully doing.

That gives me feelings of “All lives matter” which minimized the issues of black people. Can you explain why this is different?

Thanks for taking it seriously, that’s what I was looking for.

I’m also not a lawyer, but I do have a disability covered by the ADA. I understand that ADHD is a recognized disability. That’s not the specifics I was looking for.

That being said, the ADA doesn’t define how to make a website accessible and that typically falls to the WCAG, which is not specifically mentioned in the ADA (though neither is ADHD, those cases you mentioned confirmed it is covered). The best things I can find than might cover the specifics of ads are maybe section 2.2.2 or 2.2.4 or 2.4.1 of the WCAG (the first and last are level A, the middle AAA, with the standard recommendation being AA.). How would you apply those (or others you think are more appropriate to ad blocking) given that the guidelines are for service providers and ad blocking is usually done client-side. Examples for 2.4.1 given by W3C just seem to specify a way to move past things like ads via a link.

Also, some interesting other things:

This mentions the following and cites the case on their site:

For example, a web-only service with no nexus to a physical place of public accommodation is not subject to the ADA under Ninth Circuit precedent.

I’m not sure if that’s changed since 2019 or not. California has more specific legislation that covers that, though.

I’m all for ad blocking and accessable websites, I just don’t think the ADA covers ad blocking through the WCAG.

And remains unanswered. The ADA is real law with real text; it doesn’t just mean whatever someone wants it to. So I’m asking, in the text freely available at https://www.ada.gov/law-and-regs/ada/, where is the part that would apply in this case. There’s even other parts of that site that break things down in laymen’s terms. If the person doesn’t understand the ADA, the opportunity to learn a little about what it does and does not cover is available.

A violation of which part of the ADA? Can you point an a specific part of the law that would cover it?