Like I very clearly stated in the other thread, I avoid you except for calling out your misandry bullshit, and this comment is more than close enough to qualify.
“I’ve got enough of the comments that you did make to judge you on the ones you don’t.”
and I edited it for style and readability.
I edit my comments like this all the time and will continue to do so as long as it doesn’t change the general meaning/intent. I’m sorry you don’t like it, but then again, I don’t like all of the misandry in your comments and would much rather you edit it out after the fact, so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Misogyny being objectively worse than misandry in a wide variety of ways does not excuse you from adding to the misandry that does exist, in this case demonizing OP for a title that clearly wasn’t misogynist and which could easily have been based on their lived experience.
We should be lifting each other up, not fighting about who is dragging each other down harder.
The whole “I’m just innocently asking questions” schtick clearly isn’t working in this thread. You’ll get 'em next time though (as long as you post in womensstuff where nobody will call you out on it, of course!)
Idk man it seemed kind of misogynist to me. If you make a general unqualified statement based on your lived experience, you are (ambiguously) applying that experience to others based only on their immutable qualities. At least, that would not be an uncommon nor entirely unfounded reading of the statement’s intent.
You have avoided engaging meaningfully with any of my comments and have interpreted them with so many preconceived layers of this conversation that I legitimately do not know what point you are trying to make here.
I have plenty of comments that you did make to judge the ones you don’t make by.
You have excellent mind-reading skills /s
I thought you were avoiding me? Here you are again. Love to see it.
Like I very clearly stated in the other thread, I avoid you except for calling out your misandry bullshit, and this comment is more than close enough to qualify.
In what way is calling out percieved misogyny considered misandry?
In the same way calling out perceived misandry is considered misogyny, apparently.
What do you think OP meant by the title?
That the original OP clearly had a specific person in mind when making the meme.
Another edit after I responded.
Don’t your comments stand on their own?
For anyone interested, the original comment was:
“I’ve got enough of the comments that you did make to judge you on the ones you don’t.”
and I edited it for style and readability.
I edit my comments like this all the time and will continue to do so as long as it doesn’t change the general meaning/intent. I’m sorry you don’t like it, but then again, I don’t like all of the misandry in your comments and would much rather you edit it out after the fact, so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Misandry does not exist the same way misogyny does.
I won’t be editing this one either.
Misogyny being objectively worse than misandry in a wide variety of ways does not excuse you from adding to the misandry that does exist, in this case demonizing OP for a title that clearly wasn’t misogynist and which could easily have been based on their lived experience.
We should be lifting each other up, not fighting about who is dragging each other down harder.
Did I demonize OP by quoting the title?
I’m confused as to why you even bothered quoting the title if you had no meaning behind your quotation.
Sounds very “I’m just asking question here”
The whole “I’m just innocently asking questions” schtick clearly isn’t working in this thread. You’ll get 'em next time though (as long as you post in womensstuff where nobody will call you out on it, of course!)
You’ve projected a lot onto a single comment I made quoting the title.
Your comments are a very finely polished lens that lends itself well to accurate and detailed projection.
Idk man it seemed kind of misogynist to me. If you make a general unqualified statement based on your lived experience, you are (ambiguously) applying that experience to others based only on their immutable qualities. At least, that would not be an uncommon nor entirely unfounded reading of the statement’s intent.
Lol, this couldn’t be a more perfect response for you to have made after the last comment of yours that I read.
Link for anyone interested: https://lemmy.world/comment/25127146
It’s a good question.
In what way is calling out perceived misogyny considered misandry?
My answer is the same: in exactly the same way that calling out perceived misandry can be considered misogyny.
You have avoided engaging meaningfully with any of my comments and have interpreted them with so many preconceived layers of this conversation that I legitimately do not know what point you are trying to make here.